bunnyjadwiga

It would mean more bibliographic information to record in ones' references, but maybe considering resources that are provided through EZProxy or somesuch, could be considered to be 'closed' and part of the uni instead of on the open web?

I mean where the URL still contains your university, like http://[resource URL].ezproxy.[university].edu.au

Including the URL in the bibliography would show that it was an 'approved' source, and not wikipedia. It just all falls apart when you look at a lot of the journals that have made their back issues online available to anyone though. (Examples being the Hrčak portal, or the copyright-expired books at the Digital Library of Wielkopolska.)

I do wonder how much of the anti-internet sources feelings are due to the use of the internet being seen as the 'easy' way to get information, so the lecturers are trying to get their students to walk into a library instead of sitting at home on their computers with remote access to electronic journals?