bunnyjadwiga (
bunnyjadwiga) wrote2008-01-11 11:13 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
And while I'm whining...
The Chicago Manual of Style is just whacked. Any citation style that can reduce me to bouncing up and down squeaking "I just want to know where to put the damn commas!" is definitely argh. (Of course it might be easier to work if I wasn't trying to use the ONLINE version of the Chicago Manual of Style...)
Anything that makes you change ALL THE PUNCTUATION-- every single bit-- in your citations when you change them from bibliographies to footnotes or vice versa makes me ill. Let's not even get into the difficulties of trying to interpret the bits about citing online sources without actual examples of said citations.
The things I do for my art...
Anything that makes you change ALL THE PUNCTUATION-- every single bit-- in your citations when you change them from bibliographies to footnotes or vice versa makes me ill. Let's not even get into the difficulties of trying to interpret the bits about citing online sources without actual examples of said citations.
The things I do for my art...
no subject
We're supporting a recommendation for the school to move to a single citation style (MLA) to be taught in all Freshmen English classes. It's purely out of spite for the CMS. And Turabian. That's also a hot mess.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Why Chicago?
Re: Why Chicago?
no subject
Honestly, though, I've never found a style guide that didn't drive me insane.
no subject
Thinking about it, the same could be done (and probably has been) with xml and a sprinkling of the right flavour xslt.
no subject
Good luck with the commas!